skip to main |
skip to sidebar
The title of this blog usually refers to roller coaster rides and riders having a minimum height requirement. Recently, this has been taken to the next level at the new Universal Studios' Harry Potter themed park in Orlando, FL. Potential riders were turned away from the 'Wizarding World's' ride because their girth was too much for the safety restraints to secure them. This Yahoo! post exclaims the predicament.
Most people remember the feeling of not being tall enough to ride an amusement park ride, but some would-be riders of the signature attraction at Universal Studios' new "Wizarding World of Harry Potter" theme park in Orlando are being turned away because of their girth. The ride, "Harry Potter and the Forbidden Journey," employs individual restraints to keep each guest tucked in to his or her seat, but the restraints aren't large enough to accommodate heavier riders.
The article goes on to state a growing problem in the US, people are becoming significantly overweight (quote link does not work).
That's all fine and good, but considering the average weight of an American man is 191 pounds (and rising: in 1960 it was 166 pounds), "Harry Potter and the Forbidden Journey" could be turning away quite a few potential revelers.
I am not going to make an outright political statement here, but I am going to make a cultural critique. This effect is not limited to the US anymore just to point out the problem's extent. Everyone argues why the world is getting larger, I have a theory below.
We as Americans are getting larger due to two main reasons, lack of exercise and diet. The lack of exercise makes a person unhealthy. Before the exercise craze of the 1980's, most adult Americans did not exercise significantly. In the past average Americans were not the healthiest around, but at least the majority were not overweight. This leaves one last culprit, poor diet. I truly believe what is packing on the pounds is an overload of sugars in the diet. The easiest sugar sources to remove would be soft drinks and snacks. Even if one accomplishes that goal, the amount of sugar found in food sources such as cereals and other processed foods are enormous. Go to a supermarket and look at the amount of sugar in "healthy" cereals? Most tend to have a minimum of 19 grams per cup and the second ingredient on the box is sugar!! Multiply this amount through most of the foods we eat. Sugar has little nutritional value and creates body fat if a significant amount is consumed. Excessive amounts of consumed sugar is the problem.
Many studies concerning weight gain and loss are always being published. This study recently published is about moderate alcohol consumption and weight gain by women. It hints that alcohol in the subject's diet reduced weight gain. Once again, the supposed evil things in life may help us in moderation. It may help explain the French conundrum of eating rich foods and staying thin (French drink wine). In a prior post, I discussed how cheese has the chemical compound linoleic acid that increases a person's metabolism slightly reducing weight gain. What are the exact benefits to moderate alcohol consumption?
First of all, heavy alcohol consumption is NOT good for anyone. It leads to weight gain and other various chronic health problems. Societal problems also arise with the inability to properly function among people. Alcoholism goes down all the bad paths your mother warned you about. I condemn daily drinking of 3 or more drinks in a setting. Even more damaging to a person's body is binge drinking at 5+ drinks in one setting. We as a society should find ways to reduce such drinking.
Moderation in all things. Drinking a couple of drinks a day will not hurt you. The study linked above followed 19,220 women aged 39 and older who started with a normal body mass index or healthy body weight. The study followed these women 13 years and found:
"An inverse association between alcohol intake and risk of becoming overweight or obese was noted for all four types of alcoholic beverages [red wine, white wine, beer and liquor], with the strongest association found for red wine and a weak yet significant association for white wine after multivariate adjustment," the authors write.
Very interesting. The exact reason why is not speculated in the article. It is another study that questions the dietary orthodoxy we are often hear. We need more studies like this example.
I have been at a quandary on topics to write. Today at work, we had a discussion concerning veganism. First, I will give a definition on veganism and categorize the diet as an extreme form of vegetarianism. The most common form of vegetarianism is lacto-ovovegetarianism or a vegetarian who eats eggs and consumes dairy products. Several variations of the protein loving vege types exist. If the diet is carefully planned, the egg/milk consuming vege types can live long, healthy lives. Be warned, a poor vegetarian diet is just as bad as a poor omnivorous diet though. As your momma said, "Eat your vegetables!"
Veganism takes a further step removing all forms of animal byproducts including dairy and eggs. Animal products have high concentrations of certain vitamins and minerals that may be found in plants, but the plants have low concentrations. These are iron, zinc, calcium, vitamin D, and B12. Removal of all animal byproducts severely limits the intake of these vital nutrients and could lead malnourishment. Supplements are often taken by vegans to fulfill their needs. The one of interest is vitamin B12. B12 is from yeast or bacterial activity, but the only source in modern diets is through animal products. Vegans do not eat any forms of animal products, thus, they will suffer vitamin B12 deficiency over a long period of time. What if they take supplements? Supplements come from a form of living animal byproduct, they are not vegan if B12 is one of them. Other deficiencies will also come into play from lack of these nutrients over a long period of time. Someone may live in good health over a few weeks or months, but any longer that is not possible. No large group of individuals is found worldwide that strictly adheres to veganism as a result. I will make the statement simple and clear. Healthy, strict, long-term vegan adherents are like Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny, they DO NOT EXIST.
This leads me to the second half of my post, something of interest to vegans, vitamin supplements and their benefits. In a prior post, I spoke about the value of research studies on health and continuing medical care. This study questions the beneficial value of supplemental vitamins. The multitude of vitamins individuals take for various disease preventative purposes may not have that significant of an effect on actually preventing the disease. In some cases, as with antioxidants and heart disease, it may actually be worst than not using the vitamins. (Note: Links do not work in paraphrase.)
The news on antioxidants, the darlings of the vitamin menagerie, is even more troubling. These compounds, which include Vitamins A, C, and E, selenium, beta carotene, and folate, fight free radicals, unstable compounds thought to damage cells and contribute to aging. But not only do antioxidant supplements fail to protectagainst heart disease, stroke, and cancer; they actually increase the risk of death, according to a 2007 analysis of research on more than 232,000 people, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, as well as other studies.
The article does make the statement that in cases of diets that lack certain nutrients (i.e. Vegans) vitamins are recommended and are beneficial. Vitamin supplements are not all bad. As for the preventative ideals concerning disease, this study demonstrates our basic lack of medical knowledge about the complex interactions vitamins have within our bodies. More studies are required in the future to clear our understanding.
