Computers do not have psychology

In previous posts, I discuss equities investing or stocks using technical analysis (TA) to guess the market (see here, here, here and here). One common form of TA is known as Elliot Wave Principle (EWP) which depends on the collective psychology of investors charting price patterns over time into 5 distinctive waves. Over the last couple of years as I have dabbled in stock investing I have attempted to use EWP unsuccessfully with the New York Stock Exchange indexes. EWP came to my attention in the 2007-2009 crash as the price action followed the 5 waves. If it was true then, it must be true just a few months later? I have come to the conclusion that TA including EWP is not very effective at the current time in US stock markets because of how the market's composition has changed even in a brief period. It has to do with investor psychology (or lack of) and other outside influences.

I will give a brief history of how the US stock market changed over the last couple of decades. In 2001, markets began to trade stock in $0.01 increments in a process known as decimalization. Prior to this, all stocks were traded in fractions of (n/16) fractions of dollars. One advantage of fractions was the fact stock brokers with ask and bid prices at the increments. The slight (n/16) difference between the bid and ask price was the amount a stock broker could make buying and selling blocks of stocks for customers. The second innovation was the market switched to partially computerized operations in NYSE operations and is fully computerized in the NASDAQ market. In a nutshell, the pits with traders buying and selling stock are gone. The price action mostly occurs within a giant computer.

This "modernization" of the markets led to new kind of investment strategy, computerized trading at a quick speed. Basically, picture supercomputers directly connected to the exchange computers through a high speed Internet connection. Why would anyone do that? It is capitalizing on the same trade strategy as day traders. Buy and sell millions of stock simultaneously of just a few pennies of profit and the pennies turn into hundreds of thousands of dollars quickly. Add in the ability to trade put in quotes and cancel transactions before they are processed, one has quite a money making strategy. This process is known as high-frequency trading (HFT).

How does this influence TA? As stated before, TA is based upon investor psychology and the desire to hold stock over various lengths of time from hours up to years. Traders make buys and sells in a response to price movement creating the distinctive TA patterns. HFTs buy and sell stock within a matter of seconds. HFTs can even move millions of stocks down to milliseconds time frames! The HFT responds in a near instantaneous, mechanized manner to stock movement. The resulting trade psychology does not appear on the stock price charts. If HFTs were a small minority in the stock community, it would not directly influence TA. This was partially the case during the 2007-2009 crash with HFTs being ~40 % of the market's participants. EWP traced out the 5 distinctive waves. Currently, HFT represents ~60 % of all trades made on the US exchanges and can account for ~70 % on light trading days. Since this represent the majority of trades, the price action is not driven fully by investor psychology making TA less effective. I believe TA is useless over short periods of time.

One other factor distorting the markets are US government authorities. The government's stimulus and various Federal Reserve programs (TARP, TALF, POMO and etc) are putting money into investors hands in indiscriminate, unequal ways. The "free" money ends up being investing in the market in unorthodoxy manners.

The aha moment I had last night was using TA to avoid these unwanted outside influences into the markets. The only market to my knowledge that is too large ($100s billions per day) for authorities to significantly manipulate are foreign exchange markets (FX). These markets are based upon converting money into different currencies worldwide and HFTs would also have no interest in these markets. What FX markets can follow using TA are carry trades and whether investors are seeking risk or are seeking a safe haven for their investing.

The stock market casino

One institution that has significant amounts of mythology and lore surrounding it operation is the US stock market. Wall Street has made many a man wealthy. These wealth generating stories are legends. What no one really talks about is about those who lose money and are often bankrupted by the same institution. In a prior post, Baseball cards as equities, I give a brief analogy describing stock trading as an ongoing auction. What is important is stocks have no value except what an individual is willing to pay and in the end, it is a zero-sum game.

As the market has been plunging over the last week and a half, it caught me by surprise on Tuesday with a sudden drop. That is the nature of the casino. I am guessing most stock owners are in a bloodbath at the moment. This gives me a chance to outline three kinds of investors on Wall Street.

Investor #1, The Insider
The insiders are professionals who either play stocks/bonds as a profession or are extremely wealthy individuals who have the inside track to corporate America. This group is the smallest consisting (guessing here) of at 0.1 % or 1 in 1000 investors. I guess they own 15-20 % of all stocks and bonds though. This group will always make money in the end because they have the knowledge and power to manipulate individual stocks. Insiders know when a big time news event is going to happen even before a public announcement. One fictional character who fits this category is Gordon Gecko in the 1987 movie Wall Street. The majority of all profits reside in this elite group. We define this group as those who know what is occurring.

Investor #2, Experienced, Successful Traders
This group of traders do not have the inside track as The Insiders do, but they have an idea of how Wall Street works. This group consists of smart hedge funds, individual traders and those at big bank trading groups. They consist of about 10 % of all investors. They probably have 15-20 % share in total assets. This group makes money most of the time. Since they lack advanced insider knowledge, they also lose on many trades. One subcategory of this group are high frequency traders (HFT). This subgroup uses high speed supercomputers to beat the market. What is even more interesting, HFT represent ~80 % of all trades made on the New York Stock Exchange. HFT are what control the majority of stock movement in modern stock exchanges. We define this group as those who know that they do know what is occurring.

The initial two groups outlined above are known as the smart money. They make money off of stocks and bonds. Who do they make money from? The following group, the dumb money.

Investor #3 Retail Investors and Inexperienced Traders
This group of traders represents the majority of investors. It includes all of those who put money into mutual funds, 401ks, IRAs, day traders (yes, day traders) and the majority of part time traders. This largest group of investors is fed the normal "fundamentals" and "over the long run stocks are the best investment" advice. Unfortunately, this is not the case because the stock market does crash. Crashes wipe out a significant amount invested in this group. As I previously stated, stocks are worth only what someone is willing to pay and they do not have an intrinsic value. The "fundamentals" advice is just smoke and mirrors to convince the average Joe to invest. Smart money knows these stock truths and avoid crashes. The lost dumb money proceeds ends up going to the smart money. We define this clueless group as those who don't know that they don't know.

The wave of pain

In previous posts, I gave a brief outline of Elliot Wave principle and how it pertains to investor psychology in stock markets (click here and here for the postings). I also spoke about the sovereign debt crisis in Greece along with the problems of the PIIGS. This post will bring together these two concepts and what is currently happening on the US stock exchanges.

Today was a massacre. The three major indexes (Dow, NASDAQ and S&P 500) all fell more than 3%. One major factor roiling the market is the continued debt crisis in Europe. Even after ~$1 trillion USD bail out a few weeks ago from the European Central Bank (ECB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the European Union (EU) is still not economically stable. More debt does not solve Europe's fundemental marcroeconomic issues. The country that is the focus of attention is Hungary. Hungary is not part of the EU, but the former communist block country received significant amounts of loans from EU based banks. Hungary is threatening to default and the potential massive losses to those EU banks are both enormous and destablizing. The jobs report for May also came out worst than expected. These events contribute to the main stream media's story to why the market sell off occured.

Was this sell off predictable? It is impossible to determine the exact movement or level of the stock market on any given day. Anyone who says they can is a liar or an insider. Insiders can only predict with a certain stock for limited amounts of time (insider trading is illegal). For us average folk, it is possible to approximate the direction and pattern a market may take using Elliot Wave principle (EW) which is a technical analysis method based on the Dow Theory. EW prescribes potential outcomes. The EW community tends to believe we are in Primary wave 3 of a secular bear market. We are a heavily indebted society with a debt bubble that needs bursting. Accordingly, I believe we are at this stage in the bear market as of today:

Cycle 3 of 5 (Primary wave 3)
Intermediate 1 of 5
Minor 3 of 5
Minute 3 of 5

Remember, each wave is further divided into 5 subwaves in the repetitious fractal form. The minor 3 of 5 represents the largest 3rd wave of a fractal. I was skeptical about any waves smaller than the minors, but the last couple of weeks made me a believer. The 3rd wave is also the most violent in action. The sell off today represents the sudden movement expected in this bear market stage.

The answer for the predictability question is yes. The massive sell off was predictable being limited to approximate dates and amplitudes. I was prepared by going long on inverse ETFs or funds that respond in an inverse manner to the market movement (represented stocks go down, fund goes up). This current downturn should continue on for a least a few more trading days.

Europe stops fiddling while Greece burns!

This post is a combination of several other past blog topics. It will cover economics and the stock market.

In March, I discussed the economic crisis in Greece in the post The slippery slope of Greece. In the post, four options to Greece's crisis were presented:

Option 1: EU bails out Greece with emergency loans at low rates and Greece implements austerity budget spending.
Results: If the money comes in from the other EU members, it will give Greece a little breathing room to fix problems. This requires the most powerful EU member's, Germany, blessing. If the money does show, I rather doubt Greece will do more than superficial changes to government spending. Greece has cheated on its obligations in the past, thus, why should it change now? EU members know this. The cash influx would last about 6 months and nothing structurally would have changed. Greece would be where it started. Even if the austerity measures were fully implemented, Greeks make is a national past time to protest. The economy would face a decline in productivity resulting in further economic problems.

Option 2: Bailout from the US Federal Reserve in low rate loans
Results: Same as in option 1. The advantage of this scenario is it could be kept secret. For Europeans, it is the best option since Europe do not have to pay. American taxpayers get the bill when option 4 below occurs.

Option 3: International Monetary Fund (IMF) steps in and gives emergency loans to Greece.
Results: Same as option 1 again. Two negative aspects loom here. One, I believe this would break terms of the EU. Other EU states would retaliate, dumping on Greece in various ways. Greece might get thrown out of the EU. Two, the spending restrictions the IMF imposes during its assistance programs are harsh. Greece will enter into an economic downward spiral as socialist union workers shut the country down from mass protests.

Option 4: Greece defaults on sovereign debt
Results: It is impossible to determine what will occur after the actual fact. Greece would enter into a severe depression though. The key is membership within the EU. Will it remain a full or partial EU member? Will it keep the euro as a currency? I am guessing the IMF would step in here and impose their will. Greece would have to accept a bitter pill.

It appears as if a variation of Option 1 won. The ECB announced last night along with aid from the IMF a $955 billion rescue fund for the entirety of the EU states dependent upon the Euro. The plan is bailing out all of Europe! The intention of the rescue was to defend the value of the Euro. Really, the plan is nothing more than printing money and providing it to banks across Europe. In the long term, it is going to devalue the Euro even further. It does not directly address the crisis in Europe and especially Greece, too much debt.


In two previous posts, Markets and psychology along with Market observations, I present Elliot Wave Theory and how equity markets are driven by investor sentiment. It is time for a Dr. Coffee's Market Update.

In February, I was predicting that we had begun Primary Wave 3, AKA the Ponzi wave. The market had a mind of its own and recovered after the sell off in January and February. It continued on the ever appreciating march to the moon. Primary Wave 2 had not yet finished and had me fooled into a sudden crash as expected in Primary 3.

Well, things have changed. The sudden drop and high volume accompanied with the sell off starting on April 27 is more characteristic of a 3rd wave. Last Thursday had the Dow Jones Industrial Average briefly drop almost a 1000 points! Today, after the European bailout was announced, all of the US indexes shot up over 4%. This is typical of a bear market rally and indicates that Primary 3 has launched. I believe this is where we are at within the wave structure:
Cycle 3 of 5 (Primary wave 3)
Intermediate 1 of 5
Minor 2 of 5

If this is true, expect significant downside to the US stock market. If not, the market may fool me again!! I reserve the right to be wrong.

Baseball cards as equities

Most Americans know of that sports fanatic who seriously trades baseball cards. I had a little interest in these things when young. Recently, I am had an idea using these sports memorabilia items as an example to explain the general operation of the stock market. First, I will define why stocks and baseball cards have any value.

Baseball card value is dependent upon a collector's desire to own the card. Rarity, nostalgia and the desire to complete a collection often add to a card's value. The actual card has no inherent economic value except what a trader is willing to pay.

Stock shares are portions of a business. Companies sell shares in initial public offerings to raise money. The owner of a share(s) owns a small portion of that company. Most shares are traded publicly on stock exchanges and these are known as public companies. We are going to focus on public companies for simplicity sake in this analogy. The only value a stock has except the listed price on an exchange comes from dividends. In most cases, dividends paid are on the order of a few percentage of a stock's listed value, not the main factor leading to ownership. Excluding dividends, the actual stock has no inherent economic value except what a trader is willing to pay.

Back to the baseball card analogy, we are going to have a giant conference where all of the biggest traders congregate to trade in auctions. The purpose of the auction is for buyers and sellers to get the best price for their cards. It determines a fair value for cards in the auction at that given point in time. English auctions (most common type in the US) work in a simple manner. An auctioneer will start announcing to the crowd a price or ask for a card. In the crowd, investors will start bids increasing the ask price of the card. When the ask price no longer increases, the bid and ask match. The auction for the given card is over and the card is sold to the bidder from the seller at the agreed price.

Alternate the scenario a little and the stock market basic operation will be represented. Picture the baseball card traders ditching their day jobs and trading baseball cards full time? Everyday, the same baseball card is traded at an auction. The mechanics of the auction change as follows:

1) The beginning ask price of the day is the ask/bid price from the previous day.

2) Bids can now take card price in both directions. Price can increase and decrease.

This is similar to the bidding found in stock markets, except this occurs for millions of shares (cards) hundreds of times per individual stock daily. Total stock exchanged on a market is on the order of a few billion daily. The stock market is nothing more than a complex auction house to trade stock between investors buying and selling stock. Stock markets themselves have no inherent value, the participants have the capital and stock. Participants are where a market's value lies.

This analysis covers stock market basics. It does not take into consideration advanced trading strategies such as shorting stock, options and day trading to name a few.

Slippery slope of Greece

The mainstream US media tends to emphasize stories that often bring about passion from their directed audience. Americans are often disconnected from important world events. The cause of this international detachment is our relative large size or isolation from the largest Europe/Africa/Asia landmass is a topic of long debates. In either case, economic events in Europe may be powerful enough to reach our sovereign shores soon. It has to do with national debt of the commonly referred to PIIGS, (Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain) and its influence on the economic entity the European Union (EU). We are going to specifically focus on the current hot spot, Greece.

Greece is facing debt on the order of 120 % of its gross domestic product (GDP). It would take over 1 year and two months of the country's complete economic output to pay off this whopping total. This is one of the highest debt loads in the world. It grew to this large size through many avenues, some of them legal and others illegal underneath the Treaty of Maastricht forming the EU. Greece was supposed to limited its yearly deficit to just 3 % GDP by treaty terms. It seems the the Greece government has been cheating on this promise in many ways. I will avoid details here. What I am going to discuss are potential international responses to this mess from best case scenario to worst case scenario. I call into question any "best case" options though.

Option 1: EU bails out Greece with emergency loans at low rates and Greece implements austerity budget spending.
Results: If the money comes in from the other EU members, it will give Greece a little breathing room to fix problems. This requires the most powerful EU member's, Germany, blessing. If the money does show, I rather doubt Greece will do more than superficial changes to government spending. Greece has cheated on its obligations in the past, thus, why should it change now? EU members know this. The cash influx would last about 6 months and nothing structurally would have changed. Greece would be where it started. Even if the austerity measures were fully implemented, Greeks make is a national past time to protest. The economy would face a decline in productivity resulting in further economic problems.

Option 2: Bailout from the US Federal Reserve in low rate loans
Results: Same as in option 1. The advantage of this scenario is it could be kept secret. For Europeans, it is the best option since Europe do not have to pay. American taxpayers get the bill when option 4 below occurs.

Option 3: International Monetary Fund (IMF) steps in and gives emergency loans to Greece.
Results: Same as option 1 again. Two negative aspects loom here. One, I believe this would break terms of the EU. Other EU states would retaliate, dumping on Greece in various ways. Greece might get thrown out of the EU. Two, the spending restrictions the IMF imposes during its assistance programs are harsh. Greece will enter into an economic downward spiral as socialist union workers shut the country down from mass protests.

Option 4: Greece defaults on sovereign debt
Results: It is impossible to determine what will occur after the actual fact. Greece would enter into a severe depression though. The key is membership within the EU. Will it remain a full or partial EU member? Will it keep the euro as a currency? I am guessing the IMF would step in here and impose their will. Greece would have to accept a bitter pill.

Reviewing the four options above, unfortunately they all will lead to option 4. The amount of debt Greece has accrued is too much. Greece is not positioned towards a future booming economy in their current political and economic position. The bailouts (options 1-3) lead to just more debt down the road, thus, they default eventually. To put in prospective, if they pay 4.5 % annual interest on their 120 % GDP debt (~$340 billion USD according to Wikipedia) that translates into $18.4 billion (5.4 % of all economic activity) annually to service their debt interest alone. This value does not include debt principle repayments (much higher value). In recent Greek bond issues, the interest was north of 6%. They are paying significantly more than just outlined!

We are just using Greece as an example of the debt problems facing all the PIIGS. The other oinkers are much larger nations and have similar debt problems. How this will effect world bond, commodities and equity markets will be determined over the next few weeks to months. The time frame depends on if one or more of the initial three options occur, delaying the event.

Market observations

In a prior post, Markets and psychology, I mentioned a market theory known as Elliot wave principle. Elliot wave principle states the markets move in five wave fractal shapes dependent upon investor sentiment. It is a tool based upon probabilities estimating future outcomes. The theory gives investors windows of buying and selling opportunities.

I have encountered difficulty using this theory within the last week. If one examines stock charts over long periods of time, the wave can be easily identified in the data. Sometimes, the waves are not clear as they are being formed. For example, on February 9 I predicted we were on this step in the current Cycle:

Primary = 3 of 5
Intermediate = 1 of 5
Minor = 2 of 3
Minute (not sure)

After about a week of market action, this stage in the Cycle has yet to be fulfilled. My current guess as of today's close (2/17) is:
Primary = 3 of 5
Intermediate = 1 of 5
Minor = end of 2
Minute (still not sure)
I was assuming the Minor 2 of 3 was unfolding as we had entered into the 3rd Minor wave. Further market action completed a nice rebound 2nd Minor wave demonstrating we were not that far into the overall wave structure yet. The 3rd Minor is coming at a later date.

What went wrong? Two things come to mind.
1. I had my investments ready for a 3 of 3 Minor movement. My bias.
2. Other more experienced bloggers I follow came to the same conclusion. The waves were unclear as they were being traced.

It is now obvious what the wave patterns are, not so in real time. Stock market investing in general follows this unknown path. Mr. Market will move as Mr. Market chooses. As Yogi Berra said, "It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future."

Markets and psychology

This post covers a topic of interest to me, the stock market. I mentioned in a previous post, driving with the rearview mirror, about some basic concepts of the stock market. Several months have passed since my last market posting. Accordingly, I have been studying and stock trading resulting in both failure and success. The more I watch the market, the easier it is to understand that investor psychology drives the market.

One technique that I am studying is Elliot wave principle (EWP) developed in the 1930's by Ralph Nelson Elliot. Elliot observed that markets move in 5 distinct sets of waves according to prevalent market psychology. When in a bull market, impulse waves move the market up. In a bear market, impulse waves move it down. Waves 1, 3 and 5 are the impulse waves, while 2 and 4 are the corrective waves. Impulse waves are further subdivided into smaller sets of 5 fractal waves. Corrective waves have an a-b-c wedge like pattern and are also subdivided into smaller waves. The time span of the waves are from decades to hours on ticker charts. To be honest, the larger waves on the order of days (Minute) up to years (Primary) follow this pattern making distinctive patterns on ticker charts. Time spans greater than several years and less than several days tend not to fit into exact scenarios. It is just wishful thinking putting noisy or irrelevant data into such a pattern in my opinion. The take home message is Elliot wave principle follows what truly drives a market, investor sentiment.

Elliot wave principle is a loose theory, it has multiple outcomes during any given situation. Market timing and wave amplitudes are based upon Fibonacci numbers. Exact values fit into a range. Here is where EWP is useful, it tells us approximately when the market will turn and to the approximate degree a rally or sell-off will carry a market. It determines buying or selling windows ahead of time. I suggest using other technical indicators (MACD, stochastic and etc.) as complimentary tools when waves are not clear, which often waves are unclear. Investigation of the stock's price movement (who owns it and why) will further help an investor.

In practical application, I believe as of February 9, 2010 we are in a bear market at the following point in a Cycle. This means the overall market movement is downward.
Primary = 1 of 3
Intermediate = 1 of 5
Minor = 2 of 3
Minute (not sure)
Using this, I made a successful and unsuccessful trade. The unsuccessful trade occurred because of undesired price movement premarket. My blunder even as the stock moved in the desired predicted direction. This is why the system is not going to make anyone rich without following good trading practices.

I will post further on this topic to see if my evaluation and Elliot wave principle holds true.

Driving with the rearview mirror

One source of continuous fascination is the stock market. Why not? Put in a little money, it grows, and in the end profit without labor. How can you not like that! Billions of dollars is exchanged on the world's stock exchanges daily. Stock markets exist as an easy way for companies to raise money through a collective public ownership. Of course, the market operation is much more complex.

The psychology behind this money for nothing concept supports the main market drivers, fear and greed. Everyone who has struggled to make a dollar and put it into an online brokerage account understands this. They love when the market goes up and make money. Optimism pushes buying, the market rises. They absolutely hate when the market goes down with money evaporation. Pessimism leads to selling, the market craters. In the end, the market is a sentiment machine driven by the various kinds of investors summarized by this site.

Excluding day traders, two main kinds of investors exist: fundamentals and technical. Fundamental trading is based upon the idea that a stock is worth a certain value according to corporate size and revenues. Profitable companies are worth more than unprofitable entities. The other investors are technical traders and their trading is dependent upon derived indicators. Some of the best known indicators are:
Moving Average Convergence-Divergence (MACD)
Fast and Slow Stochastics
Relative Strength Index
Bollinger Bands.
The basic concept behind all of these indicators is to identify the point at which a stock changes momentum, i.e. stops going down in price and begins to appreciate.

The movement of the markets has thousands of traders everyday bidding prices up and down. Buying and selling stock. One school of thought has stock market movement being random. Looking over years of stock market data, patterns appear. Typically in upward movements followed with an occasional sell off forming a wave pattern. Personally, I believe the day-to-day patterns are random, but over time patterns do exist. Technical trading is supposed to clue an investor into these patterns identifying momentum changes. Honest traders admit they are lagging indicators or tools that tell investors when to buy (or sell) after the momentum has already changed. I agree, but another serious issue that is a fly in my ointment is these indicators all use past data. What happened yesterday, may not necessarily happen tomorrow. Yes, the indicators show stock price going up. If another disaster like 9/11 hits New York, will the indicators show this. NO!!!!!! As we discussed earlier, the market tends to be a sentiment indicator. One frustrated mutual fund manager has heart burn from his favorite Indian restaurant may drive down a stock. The indicators will not pick this up until it is too late. I think the best analogy is driving down the road using the rearview mirror instead of looking through the windshield. That crash ahead is pretty rough.